Here's A Healthy Environment For A Feminist Pawn, Uh, Little Boy, To Grow Up In
Paul Joseph Watson tweet:
On a related note, the last person who snarled about my "privilege" attended Yale. Me? I once took the train there and walked around.
via @CathyYoung63
It sounds like she's trying to raise him to feel like a guilty, inferior, worthless piece of shit.
BunnyGirl at July 14, 2015 9:54 PM
Yeah who cares about that. Let's ask the real question.
Did she take a dick to make a kid?
If so, what kinda fucking man allows this shit?
Ppen at July 14, 2015 10:18 PM
What BunnyGirl said. Poor kid.
a_random_guy at July 14, 2015 11:13 PM
Economist Don Boudreaux on the origins of privilege:
"The etymology of the word “privilege” is obvious if you think about it: “privi” – private; “lege” – legislation. Private legislation. (“Special privileges” is, therefore, a pleonasm.) A person who is truly privileged, therefore, is a person who benefits from a special use of government force wielded in his or her favor. This use of force is not generalizable beyond the individual (or small, closed group) for whom the privilege is created. A genuine privilege is a benefit that government bestows on only an individual or on a small select group with the intention of benefiting that individual or members of that small group even if such benefits come at the greater expense of the general public."
http://cafehayek.com/2015/07/privi-lege.html
Or, to paraphrase the immortal words of Inigo Montoya: They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Dwatney at July 15, 2015 4:34 AM
Life is unfair and then you die. You can enjoy what you've got or resent others. It's a choice we all make, every single day.
MarkD at July 15, 2015 5:37 AM
Poor little guy. I thought at first that maybe Mom had really wanted a girl, and was shaming her son for not being one. But it occurred to me that if it was a little girl in the picture, the sign she held might have been much worse: "I need feminism because my Mom's life sucks and she needs someone to blame for it."
Old RPM Daddy (OldRPMDaddy at GMail dot com) at July 15, 2015 5:47 AM
Re Don Boudreaux: fallacy, "appeal to authority" -- if offered seriously.
Children do not earn privileges from government, but from their family. The meaning of the word has been coopted by liars for their own benefit.
So much of public discussion is poisoned by political correctness that much of it is completely incorrect.
Radwaste at July 15, 2015 6:10 AM
This is one of feminists favorite techniques! They literally teach this stuff in collegiate women's studies courses. In MN, we had lesbian couple file a lawsuit on behalf of and in the name of their newborn son, because the women could not legally get married at the time (about 5 years ago). So what happened after their son turned 1? They split up and both moved on to other partners. Nice! Way to use him!
Jess at July 15, 2015 6:13 AM
If so, what kinda fucking man allows this shit?
I have some thoughts:
a) a beta male who defers to the woman
b) a man who doesn't know that this is his child because of said woman not informing him
I R A Darth Aggie at July 15, 2015 6:22 AM
And the SJWs will contend, with a perfectly straight face, that a white boy, who grows up in poverty with a single mom in a trailer out in the sticks, is still somehow better off than the daughter of a wealthy Hispanic or black family, who grows up in Manhattan and has her parents pay for her to do graduate studies at Columbia.
Cousin Dave at July 15, 2015 6:41 AM
And the SJWs will contend, with a perfectly straight face, that a white boy, who grows up in poverty with a single mom in a trailer out in the sticks, is still somehow better off than the daughter of a wealthy Hispanic or black family, who grows up in Manhattan and has her parents pay for her to do graduate studies at Columbia.
Posted by: Cousin Dave at July 15, 2015 6:41 AM
None of these people really wants to do any thinking about individual merit, or circumstances.
Life is so much simpler when you can assign someone to a group, and then construct a meme of *us verses them*
An ignorant populist impulse, rapidly becoming the norm.
Isab at July 15, 2015 7:40 AM
How these people can vote for HRC (husband's treatment of women, her treatment of husband's women, Chelsea's cushy jobs w/no experience taking jobs from other women) indicates their sense of judgement is really off-center (pun intended).
Bob in Texas at July 15, 2015 8:17 AM
Not only do the contend that with a straight face, they believe it.
The SJWs are mostly urban and suburban college graduates. They've never experienced, or even seen, rural poverty. To do so would require them to visit flyover land and that's filled with ... gasp ... Republicans and where you can't get a cappuccino made with Sumatran fair trade coffee.
They only white people with whom they associate are middle-class or higher - donors, activists, professors, and like-minded fellow students. Tell them there are poor white people in the sticks and the only words they hear are "racist rednecks."
Conan the Grammarian at July 15, 2015 9:14 AM
Agree w everyone. Those decrying white privilege often are white & always elite. They shudder at the thought of places like Idaho. Good. Stay away.
Another Amy at July 15, 2015 11:20 AM
The ends really do justify the means and excuse actions for quite a lot of people.
Plenty simply just want to keep getting their hand outs. Romney's 47% statement really wasn't that far off.
Miguelitosd at July 15, 2015 3:52 PM
It was dead-on. According to a political analysis shown on one of the major networks, roughly 46% of the electorate will vote Democrat no matter what, while roughly 42% will vote Republican no matter what, and that leaves just 12% of the electorate to decide the election.
Romney was just admitting that reality. His statement was twisted to imply that he wanted to be president for only 53% of the country when in reality, he was saying he wasn't going to get the votes of at least 47% of the electorate, no matter what he did and that going after the votes of that 47% was a waste of campaign resources.
Conan the Grammarian at July 15, 2015 4:32 PM
Bad news. She and her ilk have succeeded.
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/education_futures/2014/12/why_are_boys_falling_behind.html
Boys have fallen behind girls in every measure of academic success.
"The athletic, scholarly male TV heroes of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s have been replaced with Bart Simpson. These and other shifts in modern culture are responsible for devaluing traditional masculine strengths. Additionally, Sax claims that the ways in which children are being educated today simply turn boys off from schooling."
Conan the Grammarian at July 15, 2015 4:39 PM
Conan,
I love how the first comment is essentially a blame the victim argument. Saying boys just don't want to share with girls and therefor don't deserve and education. Really highlights the misandrist views of many feminists and educators.
Ben at July 15, 2015 5:24 PM
I keep waiting for someone to say "Check your privilege" to me. My response will be to pull my waistband forward, glance down, and say "Yep, still there. Anything else you'd like?"
Rex Little at July 16, 2015 8:40 AM
WTF is up with all of this privilege crap?
I guess that the people who picked on me in HS had bully privilege, the women who treat me poorly have bitch privilege, etc...
mpetrie98 at July 16, 2015 12:25 PM
Leave a comment