Beer Your Soul
I've fallen for my new best friend, a woman I met two years ago while we were both going through similar divorces. Sometimes I think the attraction's mutual. She recently started dating but hasn't met anyone she's into. I'm going crazy trying to decide whether to say something and risk losing the coolest friend I've met in decades.
--Obsessing
The line from Cole Porter is "Birds do it, bees do it," not "birds and bees get a committee together to discuss it." Telling her how you feel could be icky and embarrassing if she doesn't share your feelings -- and maybe even if she does. You've heard of "plausible deniability"? If you decide to go for something with her, what you need is plausible drunkability. Have drinks with her, get a little fuzzed, and make a move on her. If she recoils in horror, it was the alcohol talking. If she kisses back or, better yet, is all over you like freezer burn on mysterious leftovers, follow up by asking her on a date. (Emphasize the D-word, reinforcing that your interest is more than friendzonely.) Sure, by making a move, you risk losing a friend. By doing nothing, you risk missing out on a lot more. Life is risk. You can either hide under your bed or opt for managed risk. That doesn't mean managing risk out of existence; it means having a plan for damage control if things go badly. ("Captain Morgan, next time, you behave yourself!")








Miss Alkon...you have offered with this one...some of the BEST GODDAMN ADVICE I've heard in a long damn time. (Or would that be "best goddessdamn")
Kudos!
Robert at April 17, 2012 11:27 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3146792">comment from RobertAww, thank you so much, Robert!
Amy Alkon
at April 17, 2012 11:50 PM
One of the best uses for alcohol. It gives both of you a face-saving out.
This is much better than saying, "That waitress thought we were a couple. Isn't that crazy? I can't believe her. Ha ha."
Insufficient Poison at April 18, 2012 5:04 AM
Amy,
Please invent a time machine and go back and tell the 20 year old me this.
It took me until age 35 or so to learn that talking is bullshit and actions win the day.
TJIC at April 18, 2012 5:23 AM
"...plausible drunkability"
I am SO going to use this!! As often as possible!
HAH! Love it. Simply love it.
Excellent advice, as usual, Amy!
And this: "...all over you like freezer burn on mysterious leftovers"! Been peekin' in my freezer lately, eh? (I just took pork chops out for dinner. I won't tell you the date on the package!)
Flynne at April 18, 2012 5:27 AM
Yo TJIC - You invent the time machine, I'll fund. I needed that same advice then as well.
Badly.
railmeat at April 18, 2012 8:45 AM
I was in a virtually identical position a couple of years ago. We'd met in a bar and been friends for months while supporting each other in very similar divorces. We got along famously, had common interests and always had a great time together. We'd both been dating lots of other people along the way, but neither of us had as much fun with them as we did with each other. It was a benign form of torture to be with her so much but not be romantic with her, but it always seemed like the time wasn't right (and yes, I was making excuses for my cowardliness).
Late one night, after a long fun day involving a road trip to Tucson, a charity run, and a "white trash prom party" at a local pub, we ended up back at her place. She made us some sandwiches and we were drinking strong beer. I'd finally had enough of the benign torture and just said something like, "Look, we need to talk. You've been my girlfriend in every way but physically for months. I want to change that last part." We ended up in bed that same night - and we got married last month.
MikeInRealLife at April 18, 2012 9:17 AM
MikeInRealLife - Great story! Love it when it works out. Mazel Tov to you both :)
Lori M at April 18, 2012 10:37 AM
I'll second that! MikeInRealLife: Congratulations to you and your bride, and here's to many happy years together!
I do like happy endings!
Old RPM Daddy at April 18, 2012 11:54 AM
perfect and incredible advice. an inspiration to those of us risking potential new relationships.
zapf at April 18, 2012 12:22 PM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3147691">comment from zapfWow, thanks, zapf. The comments here are making me feel really good. I put a lot into coming up with these answers -- really great to know they're appreciated.
Amy Alkon
at April 18, 2012 12:25 PM
If you are a man and find yourself in the 'friend zone' you are doing it wrong.
nuzltr2 at April 18, 2012 12:55 PM
Go back and read what Robert Glover says about "Attachment to Outcome". That's the main hangup for men wanting to move forward with a woman. We get so bogged in the "what ifs?" that we're unable to keep it simple and say "Let's split a pizza", and not care if she says No.
The endless self-flagellation we see over the possibility of losing a "friend" is ridiculous.
What many women call a male "friend" is really someone who supplies endless free validation.
He's a "Nice Guy", aka Emotional Tampon, aka Girlfriend-with-a-dick.
It's sort of the converse (in a way) to when a man uses a woman purely for sex and offers nothing emotional in return.
If the "friendship" is that one-sided, it's generally better to lose it and move on to something more productive.
jefe at April 18, 2012 4:09 PM
This move is described the same way in Ladder Theory [laddertheory.com]-- trying to get from her Friends Ladder to her Real Ladder is the dreaded "Ladder Jump". There is no safety net between her Ladders, there is only The Abyss below.
Getting kicked into The Abyss isn't so bad, since it generally provides the breakaway we need to leave and find someone better.
It IS possible to handle it better-- don't get on her Friends Ladder-- It leads nowhere!
jefe at April 18, 2012 4:48 PM
Thanks very much, Lori M and Old RPM Daddy!
MikeInRealLife at April 19, 2012 8:16 AM
Like you say, life is risk.
I took the risk a few years back. Told a friend how I felt about her. She responded well. It went well for about 6 weeks, then *boom*.
I miss her as a friend. The rest? not so much. I got to learn a lot about myself. At a rather hefty price.
I've also come to learn that marriage is a really bad deal for men. So maybe it was rather inexpensive price to pay.
;-) Of course, it could be that I'm just all wet...
I R A Darth Aggie at April 20, 2012 9:34 AM
I'm in the minority here...maybe because I don't drink...but there is no such thing as "plausible drunkability." Ask Mel Gibson, who tried to blame his drunken antisemitic tirades on the booze. Alcohol does not assign feelings you don't have; it brings them to the fore. The law makes zero allowances for your conduct on the grounds that you might have had a few...and neither do I. Booze is not your condom against the potential faux pas. Take a chance, if you feel you have one, and stop being such a little pansy. She's more likely to turn you down because you're a craven, gutless wimp.
You do it, and you take the chances with the reaction, or you don't and content yourself with that. If there are no signs at all that she's interested, don't go for it.
Patrick at April 20, 2012 12:41 PM
Marriage is bad for men. Marriage typically profits a woman, and divorce profits her even more.
Patrick at April 20, 2012 1:16 PM
you want a friend...get a dog.You want a wife ,get some backbone,take the consequences and learn.
cathy at April 21, 2012 1:27 PM
Patrick, the point isn't that anyone actually believes the bullshit that "it was the alcohol", just that it's a convenient lie to deny what you already know. (It's up there with "[s]he only beats me when [s]he's drunk, other while [s]he's a nice person." Uh, yeah.)
(Heck, you don't need alcohol. I spend years in a marriage lying to myself that she was really a genuinely nice person and the emotionally abusive monster was the exception. The ability to lie to ourselves about relationships in face of the blindingly obvious is one of the more bizarre aspects of being human.)
Joe at May 2, 2012 9:55 AM
You do realize this is a woman talking about another woman ? And would your advice change if she isn't actually divorced or separated and actually has 2 kids and a partner who loves her ?
Zawiki at May 16, 2012 9:30 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3193469">comment from ZawikiYou do realize this is a woman talking about another woman ?
It's not. He's a guy. I guess I should have made that clear by adding "Guy" to "Obsessed," but if the question were one of sexuality mismatch, that would have been indicated.
And would your advice change if she isn't actually divorced or separated and actually has 2 kids and a partner who loves her ?
Um, that's not the situation here. You forgot "Would your advice change if she were a tree or a framed photo of Richard Nixon?"
Amy Alkon
at May 16, 2012 9:57 AM
Umm, read the name in the header in the original e-mail Amy, definitely a female name. Now read your first question to my GF. Not a big deal, just wondered if you had advice for the actual situation and not the edited one, but if lies posing as snarky comebacks is more fun.....
Zawicki at July 5, 2012 8:11 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3254283">comment from ZawickiUmm, read the name in the header in the original e-mail Amy, definitely a female name. Now read your first question to my GF. Not a big deal, just wondered if you had advice for the actual situation and not the edited one, but if lies posing as snarky comebacks is more fun.....
Huh?
There was no name in the header. Because that might come out in some email programs doesn't mean it will come out in all. Yes, you might have to go to the terribly hard work of telling me you're a woman as background. I know it's such a drag to type all that.
If people don't tell me they're lesbians, I assume they're heterosexual. Most of the population IS heterosexual -- reportedly only three percent or so are gays and lesbians. (That's from recent memory of stats I read.)
You failed to do your part in informing me of who you are and what your problem is.
If you want me to know something, you'd best put it in your actual letter instead of leaving me to guess and then coming on my site to bitch at me for it.
Furthermore, I write people back when they write to me with the answer, which I did to you. The fact that you can't find my answer or didn't white list my email address is not my issue.
And regarding this: " And would your advice change if she isn't actually divorced or separated and actually has 2 kids and a partner who loves her?"
Again, you're unclear in who you're talking about here, once again. Who is "she"?
I apparently answered only part of your original question in the column -- the part of this question that was interesting to publish -- because I've answered before, many times, the question about the horribly selfish people who bring children into the world and then break up the family because they love somebody else. (Actually, in looking up the original, that bit about the kids wasn't in there -- I guess I'm supposed to divine that psychically?)
You love somebody else? This is your children's problem why? Kids don't care that your sex life is bad, or that you really are lusting after somebody else, and they shouldn't have to.
You want to be somebody who drops everything for love? Don't have kids.
And you want a good answer from an advice columnist? Don't be one of those people who writes me on smartphone and puts in the barest of information, like far too many people do. Proper way to write this: "I'm a woman and the person I'm thinking of ruining my kids' lives for is a woman."
How is it that people actually need to ask me whether it's okay to break up the family their children are being raise in because they aren't quite getting off properly or aren't quite in love? Selfish, awful, unparental.
Amy Alkon
at July 5, 2012 10:41 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3254299">comment from Amy AlkonHere's our only exchange:
You never wrote back to respond to my questions. (I wasted my time searching my email [worrying that I'd done something wrong in this] and found only two results -- your original email to me, and my reply to you, which was never answered). I've deleted your email address so as to preserve your privacy, and pasted in your original letter with my question you never answered below it:
Thanks so much for eating part of my writing day (the time I spent responding to this and searching for the original). I always appreciate that.
Amy Alkon
at July 5, 2012 11:07 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3254302">comment from Amy AlkonOh, and the correct response to my answering your lazily posed, information-lacking question is "thank you," not accusing me of posting "lies" as "snarky comebacks."
Amy Alkon
at July 5, 2012 11:12 AM
Thank you. Read closely. I'm the male partner with whom my (now former)GF shared her original email. She didn't say anything about a reply.
"Umm, read the name in the header in the original e-mail Amy, definitely a female name. Now read your first question to my GF." GF = girlfriend
zawicki at August 21, 2012 8:14 AM
Amy Alkon
https://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2012/04/beer-your-soul.html#comment-3311266">comment from zawickiThere was no name in the "header" in the original email. One who wishes someone to know what sex they are should say so in their email rather than expecting that all email programs work the same.
And you're so welcome for the advice. It's always so nice when people get something entirely for free and they respond with a thank you.
Amy Alkon
at August 21, 2012 9:30 AM
Leave a comment