The Usual iWhipping Boy: No, "Tech-Driven Narcissism" Isn't What Makes Us Rude
Frances Terrell Lippman, in a letter to the editor about my recent LA Times op-ed, thinks so:
With more ways to talk about ourselves -- Twitter, Instagram, texting, Facebook, that old standby email and all the rest that will be coming along -- rudeness is inevitable.
People often blame technology -- and it feels comforting and right to do it, because we all have to duck around some asshole meandering down the sidewalk engrossed in his electronic binky (and all the other manifestations of those umbilicalized to their me-phone).
I explain in my book, "Good Manners for Nice People Who Sometimes Say F*ck" (which the op-ed is a miniature of):
[On sources of blame for all the rampant rudeness] "It's the Internet; it alienates people." Oh, right--when it isn't functioning as the single most connective force in human history. And sorry, all you cell phone blamers, but iPhones don't leap out of people's pockets and purses, put themselves on speaker, and float around the grocery store barking into the ears of everybody shopping....Much of this surge in rudeness we're experiencing is a consequence of life in The New Wild West, the world that technology made. Technology itself doesn't cause the rudeness. But technological advances have led to sweeping social change, removing some of the consequences of being rude, especially in the past fifteen years, with so many people living states or continents apart from their families and friends, often spending their days in a swarm of strangers, and being both more and less connected than ever through cell phones, Facebook, Twitter, and Skype.
And I write in the LA Times op-ed:
We're all experiencing more daily rudeness than ever, to the point where there seems to be a revised Golden Rule: "Do unto others ... whatever you think you can get away with." Pundits are quick to blame technology, too much parenting, too little parenting and the reality TV empire known as the Kardashians. But science tells another story: We have lost the constraints we had on our behavior for millions of years of human history. In short, we are rude because we are now living in societies too big for our brains.I came to this idea via the finding by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar that there's a "magic" population limit -- approximately 150 people -- beyond which civility breaks down. In a society of 150 or fewer, where everyone knows everyone else (like the small bands in which we evolved), concern for reputation keeps people from acting out. But there's no need to worry about reputation when you are surrounded by strangers, as we so often are these days, and it's transformed our society into a free-for-all for the piggy and entitled.
We obviously can't turn the clock back to a world where everybody knows everybody and the blacksmith's mother. What we can do is use my "societies too big for our brains" concept to bring back some of the constraints and benefits of the small societies in which we evolved.
This starts with letting empathy -- "How would I feel if that were done to me?" -- be our behavioral guide, rather than whether we know the person we are about to do it to. We also need to start speaking up to the rude, which is something many people feel uncomfortable doing.
To get over this psychological hurdle, we need to recognize rudeness for what it is: A form of theft. A cell boor who privatizes shared space as his own is stealing your attention. The neighbor who blasts music at 2 a.m. is stealing your sleep. And ultimately, all rudeness is the theft of everybody's peace of mind because it makes our world into an ugly shove-or-be-shoved place.
By the way, most dismayingly, the shipping message on my book at Amazon says the book will ship in "1 to 3 weeks." This is a glitch in their system. The publisher just reprinted (for the fourth time!) and that was right after the third reprint, and my editor (who is the executive editor and has some mojo!) will straighten this out on Monday. (They can get books to Amazon in a day, in my past experience!) The book is in at Barnes and Noble and should ship right away. Please order a new copy, which helps support the author (me!), which allows the author to keep writing books and keep eating at tables instead of out of Dumpsters.







Increasing rudeness has a pretty simple explanation. Most people no longer owe their livelihood to people that they live near, with, or interact with socially.
Government has exacerbated the problem, by making it easy to survive on a government check, anonymously delivered, as opposed to surviving on the direct good will of your fellow citizens.
I had an optometrist yell at my children several years ago, at a tennis center.
He didn't think they were paying enough attention to retrieving his balls that rolled onto their court.
He was in practice with an Opthomologist that was a good and decent doctor. When that doctor left, the optometrist went out of business.
I wonder why? I suspect it was because when he didn't recognize that in an extremely small city, you rub social elbows with your potential customers and the word gets around.
Isab at September 28, 2014 8:36 AM
Yes, I think you have got it right with that revised Golden Rule:
"Do unto others ... whatever you think you can get away with"
And, I agree that technology isn't any more to blame except that technology has made it for those who have always lived by that revised Golden Rule to be more obvious about it.
A couple of weeks ago, while we commuters were all trying to go down the stairs in the station as we switched trains, a young man was so busy chatting away on his cell phone that he didn't realize he was blocking us from catching our train.
An older woman spoke up and asked him could he please hang up and walk or could he get out of the way. His response? "No, I'll fucking do what I want." The cell phone really had little to do with his anti-social behavior.
Lucky for him that the rest of us had enough manners to not knock him out of the way!
And eating out of dumpsters? No, say it ain't so!
Charles at September 28, 2014 11:50 AM
What technology does (besides reducing our dependence on the goodwill of others) is give us more ways to be rude. 40 years ago, nobody held public conversations on their cell phones--because nobody had a cell phone.
Rex Little at September 28, 2014 3:40 PM
Back in the 1980s (pre-cellphone, of course) notorious theatre critic John Simon said this (and I've NEVER heard anyone else make this claim):
"Bad manners are socially inevitable because as the lower orders become more affluent, which God knows no one begrudges them, they come into situations where they don’t know how to behave. Nothing in their training has prepared them for it."
Good lord. As Miss Manners has pointed out (assuming Simon meant "lower classes"), all too often these days, it's the working classes who insist on truly formal attire at weddings and funerals, not other classes. (Can't find the column right now.)
lenona at September 28, 2014 3:59 PM
I wish I lived a hundred years ago when people dressed formally, and I could go to a real ball with long dresses. Nowadays the only real balls with long dresses are the historical re-enactment ones, which are fun but are costume parties, not real formals.
I hear they do real formals in the South, though.
But nowadays, your weddings, your funerals, your fundraisers... people wear nice clothes but no, not super formal.
NicoleK at September 29, 2014 6:09 AM
"the only real balls with long dresses"
Ref: Easter Sunday morning in the Castro.
Gog_Magog_Carpet_Reclaimers at September 29, 2014 3:04 PM
You can come down here NicoleK, but you have to wear a funny hat. I don't really know why, but if a woman goes to church or a really formal party she should wear a funny hat. Usually one that is quite large and involved.
Ben at September 30, 2014 5:56 PM
Leave a comment